Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the dosimetry between convex triangular fields of view (FOV) and similar dimension cylindrical FOVs of two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) models. METHODS: Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were placed in fiducial anatomical locations in an anthropomorphic phantom representing an adult head male for dosimetry scans. Convex triangular FOVs (100 × 80 mm/maxilla-mandible; 100 × 50 mm mandible; 100 × 50 mm/maxilla) from Veraviewepocs 3D R100 (J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) (R100) and Veraview® X800 (J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) (X800) and cylindrical FOVs from R100 and X800 (80 × 80 mm/maxilla-mandible; 80 × 50 mm/mandible; 80 × 50 mm/maxilla) were obtained, resulting in 12 different scan protocols. Equivalent doses for each relevant organ/tissue and the effective dose for each protocol were calculated. Mean effective doses were compared by the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test to evaluate the effect of the FOV and device (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The effective doses ranged between 69 and 324 µSv for the convex triangular FOVs and 76 and 332 µSv for the cylindrical FOVs. Convex triangular FOVs from the R100 device had effective doses 2.3 to 15.3% lower than their corresponding cylindrical FOVs with similar height (p < 0.05), and that difference ranged between 8.8 and 11.8% for the X800 device (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Convex triangular fields of view delivered slightly lower effective doses than the cylindrical fields of view of similar dimensions in the R100 and X800 CBCT devices. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the influence of the image geometry formation in effective dose allows optimization to reduce patient dose.

Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images?

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm activated at different times during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition on the magnitude of artifacts generated by a zirconium implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volumes were obtained with and without a zirconium implant in a human mandible, using the OP300 Maxio unit. Three modes were tested: without MAR, with MAR activated after acquisition, and with MAR activated before acquisition. Artifacts were assessed in terms of the standard deviation (SD) of gray values and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in 6 regions of interest with different distances (10 to 35 mm, from the nearest to the farthest) and angulations (70° to 135°) from the implant region. RESULTS: In the acquisitions without MAR, the regions closer to the implant (10 and 15 mm) had a higher SD and lower CNR than the farther regions. When MAR was activated (before or after), SD values did not differ among the regions (P>0.05). The region closest to the implant presented a significantly lower CNR in the acquisitions without MAR than when MAR was activated after the acquisition; however, activating MAR before the acquisition did not yield significant differences from either of the other conditions. CONCLUSION: Both modes of MAR activation were effective in decreasing the magnitude of CBCT artifacts, especially when the effects of the artifacts were more noticeable.

Evaluation of soft tissues simulant materials in cone beam computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different materials in simulating soft tissues and to analyze the influence of these materials on the mean (MPIV) and standard deviation of pixel intensity values comparing them to a gold-standard in CBCT images. METHODS: Images of three piglet heads with their soft tissues intact (gold-standard) and different simulant materials were acquired: ice, modelling wax, and ballistic gelatin, with the same thickness of the original soft tissues. The pixel intensities were measured in dental, bone and soft tissues regions, in the mandible and maxilla, for all the groups. Analysis of variance, Dunnet's, Pearson's and linear regression tests were performed. RESULTS: The simulators did not significantly change the MPIV of teeth in comparison with the gold-standard (p = 0.1017). Only ice (p = 0.0156) affected the MPIV of bone. Wax (p = 0.001) and ice (p = 0.0076), but not ballistic gelatin (p = 0.5814), altered the MPIV of soft tissue regions. When assessing the influence of the location (mandible or maxilla) among the simulants, the differences were significant only for the soft tissue regions. Standard deviation was not influenced by simulants (p > 0.05), but ballistic gelatin presented the lower variability. CONCLUSIONS: The ballistic gelatin was the best soft tissue simulant since it had the lowest influence on the pixel intensity values for all regions.

Evaluation of a metal artefact reduction tool on different positions of a metal object in the FOV.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the action of a metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool when artefact-generator metal object is at different positions in the field of view (FOV). METHODS: A cylindrical utility wax phantom, with a metal alloy sample inside, was made. The phantom was positioned centrally and peripherally in the FOV for image acquisition, with and without the MAR tool activation. The standard deviation values (image noise levels) from areas around the metal sample and the control area were obtained. The numbers were compared by Student's t-test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: When the tool was activated, a significant difference of image noise was observed for central and peripheral positioning, for both control area (p = 0.0012) and metal area (p = 0.03), and a smaller level of noise was observed for images with phantoms in central positioning. A decrease in image noise with the tool activated was found only in phantoms with the metal object positioned centrally in the FOV. CONCLUSIONS: For the MAR tool to be effective, the artefact-generator object needs to be in the central region of the FOV.